Ideas Post
ProfileImg

What I like about "Witcher" books

I watched only 1.5 episodes of the Netflix series. It's pure crap. The acting, the adaptation, the cast, the footage. I mostly played the game before I finally started to read the books. To me, they are masterpieces.

    1. Food description sounds so tasty

    0

    Even when I'm not hungry and I read the scenes containing the food, gosh, I feel like I'm starting to choke up with saliva! Anjey Sapkowski did it so well, you are really starting to feel the taste at the end of your tongue.

    2. Great humour

    0

    It's very rare but when it's there it strikes you immediately.

    3. Very well developed characters

    0

    You understand everything about their inner and outer looks

    4. Well written erotic scenes

    0

    5. You feel yourself present in that world

    0

    You imagine all these villages, taverns, castles, all types of weapons, all the rules and manners.

    6. It contains characters from the most famous fairy tales

    0

    Well, mostly in the first books but it was great to read how Anjey integrated them.

    7. I feel like I'm still continuing the game

    0

    As I played the game first it's so great to read and imagine as you are still continuing to play.

    8. Variable politic schemas

    0

    9. Constant empathy to the main character

    0

    10. I feel the same way as I felt when I read Harry Potter for the first time

    0

    And it's awesome!

0 Like.2 Comments
Comment
Branch
Repost
Like
Comment
Branch
Like
0
135031
2
0
Comments (2)
kriscalulo89 @kriscalulo89
I love the witcher Netflix! lol I guess I need to read the book but books have always been better than in adaptations in movies or series.
IconReply1 Reply
arty @arty
I’ve tried to watch the next episode one more time after I finished two books but I dunno, the same disappointment. I was upset that it didn’t touch me, I was so excited to had a chance seeing the books adaptation. To me, Netflix only managed to create a good Dandelion :)
IconReply